Ms. Rosenbaum, a high school teacher in Idaho, is doing it wrong.
Her room mostly lacks high-tech amenities. Homework assignments are handwritten on whiteboards. Students write journal entries in spiral notebooks.
Ms. Rosenbaum did use a computer and projector to show a YouTube video of the devastation caused by bombing in World War II. She said that while technology had a role to play, her method of teaching was timeless. “I’m teaching them to think deeply, to think. A computer can’t do that.”
She is a republican (shocking) and is irrationally afraid of the change (shocking) technology will bring to the classroom. Instead of providing any morsel of a reasoned argument against exposing student to new technologies, she instead attempts to downplay it’s importance.
Rather than relying on technology, she seeks to engage students with questions — the Socratic method
Smash-cut to 20 students struggling to keep their eyes even partially open, counting the seconds on the analog clock circa 1967, shifting uncomfortably in a chair made mostly of lead and burnt-orange lucite. Oh, the boredom.
Why fight technology, or anything remotely progressive for that matter? A conservative position that aims to hold on to tradition for tradition’s sake is charming at best, but should’t be taken seriously. Computers in the classroom might challenge the status quo, but seriously, isn’t that how every fucking great thing in the world happens ever…ever??? Indeed.
It reminds me of John Lennon’s Aunt Mimi, who was always annoyed by his incessant guitar playing. Like Ms. Rosenbaum in Idaho, she just couldn’t quite connect the dots:
“The guitar’s all very well as a hobby, John, but you’ll never make a living out of it.”
The computer’s all very well as a hobby, children, but you’ll never make a living out of it.